DoorDash calls Uber’s lawsuit accusing it of anti-competitive practices a ‘scare tactic’
DoorDash is asking the court to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Uber in February, calling it meritless and a “cynical and calculated scare tactic.” Uber sued the biggest food delivery provider in the US earlier this year, accusing it of putting pressure on restaurants to exclusively use its services. At the time, Uber said that it heard from “restaurants across the country” that DoorDash was charging higher commission rates from restaurants that also sell their food on Uber Eats. It also accused DoorDash of threatening to demote restaurants in its listings if they’re also available on the Uber Eats app. But in its motion for dismissal, DoorDash said Uber’s lawsuit isn’t about protecting competition but avoiding it.
The food delivery provider asserted that Uber “has been unable to offer merchants, consumers, and couriers the high-quality services” that it provides, so Uber “resorted to asserting baseless legal claims” instead of competing on its own merits. It wrote in its motion that Uber’s complaint is “rooted in the misguided notion” that it has to change its business practices, which it argued are pro-competitive, to give way to Uber’s business. The company explained, however, that the law is “concerned with the protection of competition, not competitors.”
Meanwhile, Uber told TechCrunch that DoorDash was “having a hard time understanding” its complaint. “When restaurants are forced to choose between unfair terms or retaliation, that’s not competition — it’s coercion,” its spokesperson said. The Superior Court of San Francisco County, California is scheduled to hear Uber’s lawsuit on July 11.
